Valuing the benefits of green–blue infrastructure

May 21, 2024
 / 

Green–blue infrastructure provides a range of services, such as heat mitigation, energy savings, flood management, habitat, and amenity, recreation and tourism services. But there are also some less obvious ones too, like population health and wellbeing, and lower crime rates. We are working with Perth’s Water Sensitive Transition Network (WSTN), identifying the green–blue infrastructure – e.g. wetlands, waterways, parks, bushland, green corridors, stormwater assets and trees – that provide services and then quantifying the value of those services.

This information will be used to develop ‘killer facts’ and infographics that stakeholders can use to protect and restore existing green and blue assets in Perth and Peel. ‘Killer facts’ are punchy, memorable, headline-grabbing statistics that capture attention and advocate for green–blue infrastructure. They can also attract current and novel funding and financing opportunities to support implementation.

For example, street trees can increase local business income by 20% (Source: CRC for Water Sensitive Cities Australia). You can find more examples on the Knowledge Platform created by the CRC for Water Sensitive Cities (e.g. relating to urban heat, green infrastructure and natural systems).

Image

We kicked things off with a workshop at the end of April. Participants identified priorities for developing these facts and cut through messages. They considered the benefits of different green–blue asset classes with examples and evidence across the Perth region. They also considered priority issues for target audiences such as the community, politicians and businesses, and how green–blue infrastructure could contribute to meeting these priorities.

We had representatives from state government agencies (e.g. Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions; Water and Environmental Regulation; Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage; Communities; Health; Education; Infrastructure and Water Corporation), peak bodies and advocacy groups (e.g. Western Australian Council of Social Services; Western Australian Local Government Association; Perth NRM), academia (e.g. the University of Western Australia; Murdoch University) and the private sector (e.g. Josh Byrne & Associates; Urbaqua).

Image
The next step is to develop the ‘killer facts’ and identify how they can be used for different audiences. Gaps around priority issues and benefits will guide a study on evidence that can support new killer facts.